Apr 28, 2009

Diversity, Invisibility and Identity on TV

Everyday millions of people tune on their TVs for thousands and thousands of entertainment options, but do they really think about what they are seeing. I mean, we all pay attention to the plot, the jokes, the subject, the special effects and the characters, but are we missing the message behind the show? The possibly unintended message? We never really notice what, or who, is being seen or not seen. These subtle things do influence our everyday lives and we don't even realize it.

As we learned in class, the broadcasters of most things we see on TV are basically middle-aged white guys. The world we see on TV is not the world we live in, it is the world the middle-aged white male has created, filled with their opinions, ideas, concepts and stereotypes. It is impossible for one group to portray another group as accurately as the other group could. We are shown certain groups of people from the wrong perspective. We see Arabs, Asians, Aboriginals and African-Americans from the perspective of Caucasians. We see women from the perspective of men. We see Christians, Jews, Catholics and Buddhists from the perspective of Atheists. Overall, we get the wrong idea of what these things really are. These broadcasters are not Arabic, how can they possible know how to properly portray one? These broadcasters are not Christian, they don't know what it really means, all they know is the stereotypes, what gives them the right to portray Christians with their own opinion? These broadcasters are not Asian or Aboriginal or African-American, nor are they Jewish or Catholic or Buddhist, yet they are the ones portraying these groups to the world. Sure, one could bring freedom of speech into the argument, but is this freedom of speech? Or racism?

Recently, in class, we investigated this subject. We researched statistics and did our own TV viewing to see for ourselves how and if certain groups are being portrayed. Here are some of my groups findings:


The top graph is the 2003 findings of prime time TV, the graph below is our findings.

It's shocking but the representation of "the other" has in fact shrunk over the course of six years. This is surprising because this issue was addressed back in 2003 and yet the broadcasters have done nothing about it, in fact they've done the complete opposite and made matters worse. Our TV is populated with so much white that the other ethnic groups are fading into the background.

Above are statistics of races represented and the role they play (ex: main character, supporting character etc.) Our graph clearly shows that the whites dominate the main character positions. There are few if not any main characters of any other race. In fact there are barely any other races shown in any role except for white. It appears that all the other races only get mere guest appearances or background roles, if they're lucky they just might get one or two supporting roles but that's it. There is clearly a problem here, why aren't all ethnic groups getting fair opportunities? Some cases I can understand, for example in the case of a family based sit-com in which the family is white of course all the main roles will be white. But what's wrong with having some supporting characters of other ethnic groups? I don't understand why this is so. Is it just chance that there is a shortage of acting ability in other races? Or is it just racism?



Above are occupational graphs, the top one representing race and the bottom representing gender. Fortunately we didn't encounter too many racial stereotypes in this study. It was nice to see that Black actually had a higher representation in professional positions instead of the common stereotype of being criminals. Once we reached the gender graph we enter a whole new realm of stereotypes. We see that men dominate all occupations except homemaker. This feeds the old belief that women belong at home while men should be out doing the work. We live in a country that has evolved from those days, today we have plenty of male homemakers and plenty of working females. Why isn't the real world depicted on TV?

Overall we see little to no improvements in depiction of the "other" groups in today's television. It appears to me that this problem can't be solved by keeping the setup the way it is. Like we learned in class, diversity can't occur in front of the camera if diversity isn't occurring behind the camera. I'm not pointing a finger to all broadcasters. I am very happy to say that the show Corner Gas (a Canadian show) has an aboriginal actor as one of the lead roles playing a police officer. Why can't we see this more often? He is an excellent actor and plays the role amazingly. I think everyone could learn a valuable lesson from shows like this.

Apr 26, 2009

The world is just waiting for Hannah Montana to fall

(This Blog entry is in response to Part C: Discussion of Media Studies: Representation Test)

Miley Cyrus, or Hannah Montana, is the latest teen pop sensation. There's always some one that all the 7-year old girls idolize and right now it's her. She's basically one big marketing campaign, you can buy Hannah Montana Cd's, Hannah Montana movies, Hannah Montana clothes, Hannah Montana dolls, Hannah Montana pillows, Hannah Montana bed sheets, Hannah Montana video games, Hannah Montana bicycles, Hannah Montana cutlery, Hannah Montana just about anything. What I'm trying to say is this: The world loves Hannah Montana/ Miley Cyrus.

Like all great teen sensations she is bound to fall sooner or later, and if history repeats itself, it's only a matter of time until she shaves her head and checks into rehab. So far, Miley hasn't really done anything wrong, and the media is getting anxious. So, they decided to take her every mistake and amplify it ten fold.

Recently ABC News released a photo of her and some friends squinting their eyes, instantly she was accused of "mocking and denigrating individuals of Asian descent." Of course, she countered back saying that she was merely making a "goofy face."

So, the question is: was she really being racist? Or just goofing around?

I find it strange that it was instantly assumed that she was imitating an Asian. Yes, that is a common gesture used to stereotype Asians but, we must keep in mind, that very same gesture is also used to imitate someone who has had a face lift. So, maybe she wasn't imitating an Asian at all, maybe she was imitating someone who had had plastic surgery.

Or maybe she is, in fact, imitating an Asian. As ABC pointed out: the only person in the picture not doing "Asian Eyes" is the actual Asian. Was it some kind of joke? Did they decide "Lets all be Asian in this picture! But Johnny you don't have to do anything cause your already Asian!" I found it funny that the Asian boy's eyes aren't really squinted at all when you compare it to the imitators, it just shows how ridiculous and over-exaggerated the stereotype is.

Another part of the picture that indicates that they were indeed imitating Asian's is the guy in the back. He is holding up the peace sign (two fingers) which is something the Asian's are commonly stereotyped to do. Then again, maybe he is trying to give the guy in front of him "bunny ears" which also another stereotype of Asian's.

After taking a few looks at the photo I now find it hard to believe that she wasn't imitating an Asian.

Why would Miley do a thing like this? Is she trying to make a stab at an ethnic group? Of course not. She is doing exactly what she said she was, goofing off. This is just common teen shenanigans, she never meant to offend anyone, stuff like this happens all the time. But, like she said herself, the only reason this is a big deal is because it is her doing it. If it was just some average Joe no one would care, but because it is Miley Cyrus/ Hannah Montana doing it, suddenly it's important.

This raises another question: knowing that she is a huge role model for young girls everywhere, is it her responsibility to set a good example? Yes, and she shouldn't have done it. Even if she was just having fun and joking around she still shouldn't have done it. This has to considered from different perspectives. What about all the little girls who idolize her and dream to be like her? They love to imitate everything she does, suddenly they're going to get the idea that it is "ok" to imitate minorities. What about the Asian children? They might get the idea that they are "different" and feel separated from others. Of course parents will be concerned about the kind of impression she is leaving on their children.

This was a mistake on her behalf but I still believe the media is taking advantage of the situation. There are a lot worse things that celebrity role models have done, but the media is just waiting for Miley to mess up so they can be there to publish it. Miley better brace herself, because this is only the beginning.

Apr 18, 2009

D and D show episode 2!!!

It's the second episode of me and Dylan's very own video blog!!







References:

"9/11, New York" 11 September 2001. Online Image. Politicalbase.com. 16 April 2009.
"Terrorist" No Date. Online Image.Causes-of-terrorism.net. 16 April 2009.
"Hijacked Van" No Date. Online Image. Russianspy.org. 16 April 2009.
"Terrorist" 27 March 2009. Online Image. Mr.MillCity.com. 16 April 2009.
"Threatening Melbourne" 12 September 2005. Online Image. theage.com.au. 16 April 2009.
"Child Terrorists" 7 February 2008. Online Image. theage.com.au. 16 April 2009.
"Politician" 25 February 2009. Online Image. EarlyEdCoverage.com. 16 April 2009.
"Chinese Man" No Date. Online Image. Yemyint88.net. 16 April 2009.
"Muslim Man" No Date. Online Image. Muslima.com. 16 April 2009.
"Black Man" No Date. Online Image. BigSoccer.com. 16 April 2009.
"David Duke" No Date. Online Image. Wikipedia.com. 16 April 2009.

D and D show episode 1!!!

The debut episode of me and Dylan's video blog!!!






References:

"media." Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1). Random House, Inc. 08 Apr. 2009. .

Tallim, Jane "What is Media Literacy?"Media Awareness Network.com. 7 April 2009.